
Cinematic Analysis: Formalism and Psychoanalysis in Cronenberg
An expert critique of David Cronenberg’s transition from postmodern surrealism to objective psychological drama. This review examines the technical-linguistic shift in the filmmaker’s late career and the «technological nightmares» of his foundational 20th-century works.
ELECTROACOUSTICS MAGAZINE ARTICLESARCHIVAL REVIEWFILM THEORY & AUDIO-VISUAL MEDIA
Romina Daniele & ElectroAcoustics Editorial Board
10/8/2011
Online Journal Title: ElectroAcoustics Magazine
Print Series Destination: Arts & Technologies (Annual Print Selection · Historical Appendix)
Classification / Category: Archival Series · Legacy Collection (2011–2012)
Article Identifier: Art. 2026.L16.en
Publishing Model: Historical Archive Contribution (Not Subject to Prior Peer Review)
Publication Context: Issue #01: «The Electroacoustic Imperative» (2026) – Historical Appendix
Indexing & Registrations
ISSN (Online): Application in Progress
ISBN (Print): Reserved for Arts & Technologies 2027
DOI: Pre-assigned (eam.2026.L16.en)
Original Publication Date: October 7, 2011 on Electro-Acoustics.org (Milan legacy edition of this journal)
📥 PDF (ITA) | PDF (ENG)
David Cronenberg – A Dangerous Method
The subject of this intervention is David Cronenberg's latest film, A Dangerous Method [1], a European and Canadian production released in theaters—as previously noted in our related article—on September 30th, the same day as the remake of Let Me In [2]. As we have already observed, this film, while technically impeccable and shot with masterful, perfected technique, no longer shares much with the Cronenberg who historically initiated and developed cinematographic postmodernism in the final three decades of the twentieth century—a movement whose other undeniable face is represented by David Lynch (a filmmaker whose historical vision, conversely, remains uncompromised by his more recent filmography) [3].
As mentioned, this latest film, to be framed within high-level contemporary cinema, follows an original and organic path for the Canadian director. It continues the line undertaken recently, starting with A History of Violence (2005)—a style that is, so to speak, less Canadian and even less «Cronenbergian» almost more American, yet still a contemporary psychological drama.
The film's synopsis is widely available and is based on John Kerr’s book A Most Dangerous Method. The title, in both the book and the film, refers to the danger implicit in an analytical method based on the analyst's participation in the patient's pain to the point of transferring it into themselves.
What we distance ourselves from is the common trope suggesting that Cronenberg is engaged today, as he was then, in analyzing the impervious paths of the human intellect—whether from the «outside» (referring to his historical cinema) or from the «inside» (referring to his recent work). This link between the two types of cinema by the same author seems superficial and critically unfounded, as the analysis of the human mind is not the peculiar characteristic of either period. In the recent production, and specifically in this latest film, this notion is confused with the film's themes, whereas the narration is impeccably objective and detached. The analysis of the human mind is not the object of a reflection conducted through the film; rather, it is the object of its story, whose protagonists are Carl Gustav Jung, Sigmund Freud, and a singular patient of the former. From the perspective of film analysis, the story is merely one level of discourse, while the technical-linguistic and aesthetic features are, conversely, the determining factors. Therefore, the film, as a medium of authorial expression, embodies a precise description that aims above all to show its absolute objectivity.
Essentiality and elegance are thus the hallmarks of the direction, as well as every other aspect of the film—from screenplay to editing, from production design to costumes. Given Cronenberg's history, these choices seem dictated by a desire to demonstrate technical proficiency—a «stylistic choice of manner»—rather than the unconditional artistic expression of the historical Cronenberg. Furthermore, what we have termed "psychological drama" refers to the observation of psychological problems within small groups: the family in A History of Violence (2005), the gangster-hero in Eastern Promises (2007), and the analysts in the film currently under review—all set against the backdrop of contemporary society [4].
The films preceding this one, with Spider (2002) as a turning point, present strong authorial reflections evident in every aspect, strictly connected to the translation of themes from an originally objective nature to a completely different, surreal, and fantastic level. Clearly, the current film does not function this way; in it, historical data takes precedence over the technical-linguistic and aesthetic characteristics for which Cronenberg’s cinema is studied worldwide. These attributes are instead ascribed to the narrated story and its subjects of historical interest. It should be noted that the final traces of what we defined as the «translation between real and unreal levels» are found in A History of Violence (2005) and disappear entirely thereafter.
Conversely, Cronenberg’s twentieth-century cinema holds an undeniable historical-critical importance regarding its technical-linguistic features and the reflection conducted through the medium of cinema on the relationship between man and his reality/unreality. In that context, his nightmares were connected to a technological and mechanistic world that became increasingly imposing from the 1970s onward. There, the reference to the human mind was certain, but not assimilable to a mere psycho-pathological interpretation, as extensively shown by critical bibliography [5].
Ultimately, an interpretation perhaps suggested by «good old Cronenberg» exists if one admits that the narrative is connected to a distrust of psychoanalysis as a science. Jung eventually descends into a life of duplicity and pettiness, and the only surviving analyst after Freud’s death is the former patient who, during the film, transitions from being highly unbalanced to the seductress of her doctor, and finally to a practicing analyst herself. From the narrative, we infer the following: the analyst is a figure who is either not up to the task (Jung) or is themselves the product and origin of a pathology (the patient).
Related Articles:
Roman Daniele & ElectroAcoustics Editorial Board. (2011). Cinematic Comparison: Nordic Realism vs. American Esthetics. ElectroAcoustics Magazine / Arts & Technologies Archive. Available at: https://rdmrecords.com/cinema-let-me-in
Notes & Bibliography
A Dangerous Method. Official Film Promotional Archive & Documentation. [adangerousmethod-themovie.com]
Let Me In. Official Film Production Archive. [letmein-movie.com]
Lynch, David. Official Web Archive and Director Documentation. [davidlynch.com]
Movieplayer.it Editorial Board. David Cronenberg: Filmography and Critical Index. Movieplayer Archives. [movieplayer.it]
Critical Monographic Bibliography on David Cronenberg (Italian Literature)
Published Monographs & Edited Volumes:
Canova, Gianni (Ed.), David Cronenberg, Milan: Il Castoro Cinema, 1993 [Published in Italian].
Canosa, Michele (Ed.), Il cinema di David Cronenberg: la bellezza interiore [The Cinema of David Cronenberg: Inner Beauty], Recco: Le Mani, 1996.
Dalle Luche, Riccardo & Barontini, Alessandra, Transfusioni. Saggio di psicopatologia dal cinema di David Cronenberg [Transfusions: An Essay on Psychopathology from the Cinema of David Cronenberg], Rome: Sergio Sorbini Editore, 1995.
Pecchioli, Marcello, Effetto Cronenberg: metacritica per un cinema delle mutazioni [The Cronenberg Effect: Metacritique for a Cinema of Mutations], Bologna: Pendragon, 1994.
Vernaglione, Paolo, David Cronenberg, Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 1995 [Published in Italian].
Academic Theses & Institutional Publications:
Artese, Alberto, David Cronenberg: la rabbia della forma [David Cronenberg: The Rage of Form], Rimini: Municipality of Rimini / Film Archive, 1987 [Local Institutional Catalogue].
Bisi, Enrico, Dead Ringers: l'implosione nel cinema di David Cronenberg [Dead Ringers: Implosion in the Cinema of David Cronenberg], Master's Thesis, University of Turin, Academic Year 2000/2001.
Borello, Valeria, Il corpo nel cinema di David Cronenberg [The Body in the Cinema of David Cronenberg], Master's Thesis, University of Turin, Academic Year 1998/1999.
Mangili, Elisa, David Cronenberg: dal cinema della mutazione all'horror esistenziale [David Cronenberg: From the Cinema of Mutation to Existential Horror], Master's Thesis (University of Pavia, 1994) / Rome: Sergio Sorbini Editore, 1995.
Archive Source: [[http://www.davidcronenberg.de/]
How to Cite this Article
APA 7th Edition: Daniele, Romina & ElectroAcoustics Editorial Board. (2011 / 2026). Acousmonium Sator Opening. ElectroAcoustics Magazine (Historical Archive Contribution), Issue #01 «The Electroacoustic Imperative», Vol. 1 (Selected for Print Edition · Historical Appendix), RDM Records, Art. 2026.L16.en. DOI: Pre-assigned (eam.2026.L16.en).Available at: https://rdmrecords.com/cinema-a-dangerous-method
RDM RECORDS IS A FLORIDA-REGISTERED DBA OF ROMINA DANIELE, OPERATING AS A RECORD LABEL AND BOOK PUBLISHER FOR RDM ROMINA DANIELE MUSIC, A BMI-AFFILIATED MUSIC PUBLISHER.
[CATALOG] — [ABOUT] — [PRESS] — [MAGAZINE] - [CONTACT]
TERMS & POLICIES: © 2010–2026 RDM RECORDS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL TEXTUAL, MUSICOLOGICAL, AND AUDIO CONTENT IS PROTECTED UNDER INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS. DATA SUBMITTED VIA OUR PORTALS IS PROCESSED STRICTLY FOR INTERNAL INSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION.THIS INDEPENDENT INSTITUTIONAL LABEL IS DEDICATED TO PURE PHENOMENOLOGICAL, VOCAL, AND SONIC RESEARCH, AND MAINTAINS A STRICT POLICY OF COMPLETE DETACHMENT FROM ALL FORMS OF BLASPHEMY, EXPLICIT THEMES, OR PROFANE PERFORMANCES, SYSTEMATICALLY EXCLUDING THEM FROM ITS CATALOG AND SCOPE.


Get in touch



